CLAT November 7 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025

CLAT November 7 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025 has been provided here for practice purposes. Aspirants can include it in their daily practice sessions.

Abhilasha Kiran

Updated on - Nov 7, 2024 | 10:39 AM IST

CLAT November 7 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025 are here (Image Credits: pexels.com).

CLAT November 7 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025: CLAT Legal 2025 aspirants can now enhance their reasoning skills with a set of CLAT Legal Reasoning Practice questions available here. These questions are designed tohelp candidates prepare effectively for the upcoming CLAT exam. Regular practice is crucial for success in the CLAT. By incorporating these CLAT November 7 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2024 into their daily study routine, aspirants can improve their problem-solving abilities, time management skills, and overall performance.

Check More CLAT 2024 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions |

CLAT November 7 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025

Candidates must go through the CLAT November 7 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025 below.

Ques 1: Principle: It is a case of fraud where a party to a contract knows or believes a fact to be true, but conceals it actively from the other party with a view to induce that person to enter into the contract.

Facts: While taking a life insurance policy, in reply to questions by the insurance company during the inquiry into his proposal, Zameer deliberately concealed the fact of his medical treatment for a serious ailment, which he had undergone only a few weeks ago.

(a) The act of Zameer did not amount to fraud, as disclosing the fact would have resulted in the exposure of his privacy.

(b) The act of Zameer amounted to innocent misrepresentation.

(d) The concealment of facts by Zameer amounted to fraud.

Ques 2: Principle: Ownership in property consists of the right to possess, right to use, right to alienate and right to exclude others. The sale is complete when the property gets transferred from the seller to the buyer on sale.

Facts: ‘A’ sold his car to ‘B’. After this, ‘B’ requested ‘A’ to keep the car in his care on behalf of ‘B’ for one month. ‘A’ agreed.

(a) The sale of the car is not complete.

(b) Sale will be completed when ‘B’ will take the delivery of the car.

(d) The sale will be automatically completed after the expiry of one month.

Ques 3: Principle: Every agreement, by which any party is restricted absolutely from enforcing his right

in respect of any contract, by the usual legal proceedings in the ordinary Tribunals, is void to that extent. The law also provides that nobody can confer jurisdiction to a civil court by an agreement between parties.

Facts: A and B entered into a valid contract for rendering certain services. A clause in the contract was that in caseany dispute arose out of the contract; it shall be referred to for Arbitration only. Is the contract valid?

(a) Arbitration is also a valid dispute settlement machinery recognized by law and hence the entire contract is valid.

(b) The parties were trying to confer jurisdiction to some authority to decide a dispute and hence the clause would be invalid.

(d) The contract is valid but the clause regarding Arbitration is void.

Ques 4: Principle: A contract would be invalid and unlawful if the contract is for an immoral or illegal purpose.

Facts: P was a young and helpless widow, living on the pavement. R, a neighbour gave her a house, registered in her name, on the condition that she should allow R to keep his smuggled goods and drugs in her house. After the registration was done, according to the condition in the contract, R’s agents went to keep some packets in her house, but she refused. R told her the condition under which the house was given to her. She still refused. Is P justified in her action?

(a) P is not justified as she did not have the right to deny R’s request.

(b) As R was making the contract for illegal activities, P’s stand is valid in law.

(d) P is right as she did not like smuggled goods to be kept in her house.

Ques 5: Principle: Whoever takes away with him any minor less than sixteen years of age if a male, or less than eighteen years of age if a female, out of the custody of parents of such minor without the consent of such parents, is said to commit no offence.

Facts: ‘A’, a man, took away a girl below sixteen years to Mumbai without informing the parents of the girl.

(a) ‘A’ committed no offence against the parents of the girl.

(b) ‘A’ committed no offence against the girl as well as her parents.

(d) ‘A’ committed an offence against the girl.

Here are the correct answers to the above CLAT November 7 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025.

Questions	1	2	3	4	5
Answers	d	c	a	b	b

Aspirants are encouraged to utilize these CLAT November 7 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025 to their full potential. By dedicating time to daily practice, they can significantly increase their chances of achieving a high score in the CLAT Legal 2025 exam.

Check Clat 2024 Logical Reasoning Practice Questions |