CLAT November 16 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025
CLAT November 16 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025 with its correct answers are available here for candidates preparing to appear for the upcoming CLAT Exam 2025.
CLAT November 16 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025: Aspiring law students preparing for the upcoming CLAT 2025 can now access a set of practice questions for Legal Reasoning. These CLAT November 16 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025, along with their correct answers, are available below to help candidates sharpen their skills and improve their performance in this crucial section of the exam.
Legal Reasoning is a fundamental component of the CLAT, assessing a candidate's ability to understand and apply legal principles to real-world scenarios. By practising these questions, aspirants can enhance their critical thinking, analytical, and problem-solving abilities. Candidates can match their performance by matching their responses with the correct answers available at the end.
Also Read: CLAT Admit Card 2025 Live Update: Link Activated at consortiumofnlus.ac.in
CLAT More Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025 |
- CLAT November 7 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025
- CLAT October 24 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025
- CLAT October 22 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025
- CLAT October 16 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025
- CLAT October 11 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025
- CLAT October 9 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025
CLAT November 16 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025
Candidates must go through the CLAT November 16 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025 below.
Ques 1:Principle: Acceptance of a proposal must be absolute and unqualified.
Facts: ‘A’ made a proposal to sell his motorcycle to ‘B’ for rupees 25,000/-. ‘B’ agreed to buy it for rupees 24,000/-. ‘A’ sold his motorcycle to ‘C’ for 26,000/- the next day. ‘B’ sues ‘A’ for damages.
(a) ‘B’ will get damages from ‘A’.
(b) ‘B’ will get the difference of rupees 1,000/-
only. (c) ‘B’ can proceed against ‘C’.
(d) ‘B’ will not get any damages from ‘A’.
Ques 2: Principle: A person is said to do a thing fraudulently, if he does that thing with intent to defraud, but not otherwise.
Facts: ‘A’ occasionally hands over his ATM card to ‘B’ to withdraw money for ‘A’. On one occasion ‘B’ without the knowledge of ‘A’, uses ‘A’s ATM card to find out the balance in ‘A’s account, but does not withdraw any money.
(a) B’ has not committed the act fraudulently.
(b) ‘B’ has committed the act fraudulently.
(c) ‘B’ has committed a breach of faith.
(d) ‘B’ has committed misappropriation.
Ques 3: Principle: Assault is causing bodily injury to another person by the use of physical force.
Facts: Rustum while entering into compartment of a train raised his fist in anger towards a person Sheetal, just in front of him in the row, to get way to enter into the train first, but did not hit him. Rustum has:
(a) Committed an assault on Sheetal
(b) Insulted Sheetal
(c) Not committed an assault on Sheetal
(d) Rightly showed his anger
Ques 4: Principle: A contract would be invalid and unlawful if the contract is for an immoral or illegal purpose.
Facts: P was a young and helpless widow, living on the pavement. R, a neighbour gave her a house, registered in her name, on the condition that she should allow R to keep his smuggled goods and drugs in her house. After the registration was done, according to the condition in the contract, R’s agents went to keep some packets in her house, but she refused. R told her the condition under which the house was given to her. She still refused. Is P justified in her action?
(a) P is not justified as she did not have the right to deny R’s request.
(b) As R was making the contract for illegal activities, P’s stand is valid in law.
(c) R can take back the house by cancelling the transfer deed.
(d) P is right as she did not like smuggled goods to be kept in her house.
Ques 5: Principle: Whoever takes away with him any minor less than sixteen years of age if a male, or less than eighteen years of age if a female, out of the custody of parents of such minor without the consent of such parents, is said to commit no offence.
Facts: ‘A’, a man, took away a girl below sixteen years to Mumbai without informing the parents of the girl.
(a) ‘A’ committed no offence against the parents of the girl.
(b) ‘A’ committed no offence against the girl as well as her parents.
(c) ‘A’ committed an offence against the girl as well as her parents.
(d) ‘A’ committed an offence against the girl.
Here are the correct answers to the above CLAT November 16 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025.
Question |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Answer |
d |
a |
c |
b |
b |
It is recommended that candidates solve these CLAT November 16 Legal Reasoning Practice Questions 2025 to simulate the actual exam environment. By analyzing their performance and identifying areas of weakness, they can focus their preparation efforts accordingly.
Check CLAT Logical Reasoning Practice Questions 2025 |
- CLAT 2025 November 14 Logical Reasoning Practice Questions for Exam Day
- CLAT 2025 November 5 Logical Reasoning Practice Questions for Exam Day
- CLAT 2025 November 3 Logical Reasoning Practice Questions for Exam Day
- CLAT 2025 November 1 Logical Reasoning Practice Questions for Exam Day
- CLAT 2025 October 28 Logical Reasoning Practice Questions for Exam Day
- CLAT 2025 October 23 Logical Reasoning Practice Questions for Exam Day
- CLAT 2025 October 21 Logical Reasoning Practice Questions for Exam Day
- CLAT 2025 October 17 Logical Reasoning Practice Questions for Exam Day
- CLAT 2025 October 15 Logical Reasoning Practice Questions for Exam Day
- CLAT 2025 October 10 Logical Reasoning Practice Questions for Exam Day
- CLAT 2025 October 8 Logical Reasoning Practice Questions for Exam Day